ought$56061$ - traducción al árabe
DICLIB.COM
Herramientas lingüísticas IA
Ingrese una palabra o frase en cualquier idioma 👆
Idioma:     

Traducción y análisis de palabras por inteligencia artificial

En esta página puede obtener un análisis detallado de una palabra o frase, producido utilizando la mejor tecnología de inteligencia artificial hasta la fecha:

  • cómo se usa la palabra
  • frecuencia de uso
  • se utiliza con más frecuencia en el habla oral o escrita
  • opciones de traducción
  • ejemplos de uso (varias frases con traducción)
  • etimología

ought$56061$ - traducción al árabe

PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEM ARTICULATED BY DAVID HUME IN 1739 ABOUT HOW ONE CAN DEDUCE PRESCRIPTIVE STATEMENTS (WHAT OUGHT TO BE) FROM DESCRIPTIVE STATEMENTS (WHAT IS)
Is-Ought Problem; Hume's Guillotine; Humes Guillotine; The Is-Ought Problem; Is ought problem; Hume's Law; Is/ought; Is-ought; Is / ought; Is-ought dichotomy; Is ought dichotomy; Facts to values; Is ought; Is-ought fallacy; Ought from is; "Ought" from "is"; Is/ought problem; Is-ought distinction; Is and ought; Is-ought gap; Ought and is; Ought-is; Ought-is distinction; Ought-is problem; Is–ought fallacy; Is-ought problem; Ought/is problem; Hume's law; Is–ought distinction; Science and value; Knowledge and value; Value and fact; Hume's guillotine; Normative–descriptive shuffle; Normative-descriptive shuffle

ought      
v. لازم اعمله, وجب
ought         
WIKIMEDIA DISAMBIGUATION PAGE
Ought (disambiguation)
AUX
يجب يَحسُن يُتوقع ، يُحتمل يتعين او يلزم منطقيا
N
واجب صفر
ought         
WIKIMEDIA DISAMBIGUATION PAGE
Ought (disambiguation)
فِعْلٌ مُسَاعِد : يجب . يُتوقَّع . يُحتمَل

Definición

ought
v. (E) you ought to help

Wikipedia

Is–ought problem

The is–ought problem, as articulated by the Scottish philosopher and historian David Hume, arises when one makes claims about what ought to be that are based solely on statements about what is. Hume found that there seems to be a significant difference between descriptive or positive statements (about what is) and prescriptive or normative statements (about what ought to be), and that it is not obvious how one can coherently move from descriptive statements to prescriptive ones. Hume's law or Hume's guillotine is the thesis that, if a reasoner only has access to non-moral and non-evaluative factual premises, the reasoner cannot logically infer the truth of moral statements.

A similar view is defended by G. E. Moore's open-question argument, intended to refute any identification of moral properties with natural properties. Ethical naturalists view this so-called naturalistic fallacy as not a fallacy.

The is–ought problem is closely related to the fact–value distinction in epistemology. Though the terms are often used interchangeably, academic discourse concerning the latter may encompass aesthetics in addition to ethics.